Monday, June 30, 2008

Some landlords are ignoring the smoking ban in pubs

Some landlords are ignoring the smoking ban in pubs

30 June 2008
By Rachel Dearden
A year on from the new smoking laws and some rebel publicans are still flouting the ban behind closed doors in Lancashire.
It is midnight in a pub on the outskirts of town. Most of the drinkers have gone home. Music is playing in the background as the landlord pulls a pint of bitter. The doors shut half an hour ago but a handful of regulars remain.

The landlord knows them all by name and the barman knows their order.

A woman in her 20s lights a cigarette as she sits at the bar, calling in for a quiet drink on her way home from her job as a care assistant.

This is how pubs used to be but since the smoking legislation came into force one year ago tomorrow it is against the law.

Across the city, pubs like this are closing their doors, crippled by the effects of the ban and the cheap supermarket drinks prices.

Landlords are fighting to keep their head above water faced with a choice between bending the rules or going out of business.

Before long the traditional community pub could be a thing of the past.
One landlord, who allows his customers to smoke after hours, says: "I would say at least half of pubs like this are doing what we do.

"They have to. They're struggling as it is.

"They're not going to kick themselves into touch for the sake of a stupid rule.

"They're hanging on by their fingernails.

"If you stuck to the rules you wouldn't have a business.

"We can't compete with either the off-trade or the big boys up town.

"I don't like the word business – I run a pub.

"They are banning something that is a lawful act and it goes against the grain.

"I find it objectionable to have to stand outside my own pub to have a cigarette."
http://www.lep.co.uk

Labels:

Thursday, June 26, 2008

Trade down at half of pubs in first year of smoking ban

Trade down at half of pubs in first year of smoking ban
26 June, 2008

By James Wilmore

But respondents in Publican survey say credit crunch is to blame

Exclusive research has revealed that more than half of licensees have seen trade drop since the smoking ban was introduced throughout the UK.

July 1 is the anniversary of the ban being introduced in England and to mark the occasion The Publican commissioned CGA Strategy to quiz 1,500 licensees about their experiences over the last 12 months.

The exhaustive survey of a cross section of the industry reveals the real picture of the smoking ban on pubs.

Results show that while 52 per cent of licensees have reported a drop in trade in that time the majority pinpoint the credit crunch - rather than the smoking ban - as being the main reason for such a bleak year.

Meanwhile 38 per cent of respondents said sales remained the same and only 10 per cent said business was up.

A fifth of those who saw trade drop reported a fall of up to 30 per cent.

“No-one wants to stand outside in the cold and the rain,” said one licensee who has seen sales plummet.


The smoking legislation was second out of the reasons for a fall in trade, followed by budget hikes on alcohol tax, the rising cost of raw materials and last summer’s poor weather.

Of these, many had seen a drop off in business during the week and relied on weekends to carry them through.

Councils were also blamed for refusing permission for outdoor facilities.

For the minority that have seen sales increase, food was attributed as the main reason. The research also found that pubs that have stepped up their food offer have seen dry sales overtake wet.

Families also appear to be playing a part in helping some licensees weather the storm. One respondent said: “What we have lost in smokers we have gained in families.”

And despite the doom and gloom, the licensees polled were looking forward to a good summer and some have already seen trade pick up due to better weather.

Nick Bish, chief executive of the Association of Licensed Multiple Retailers (ALMR), said although the results were expected it is important for the trade to “promote the positive”. But he warned: “The things we have to look out for are issues such as noise and litter and also the anti-smoking brigade looking to push the ban out into the open air.”
http://www.thepublican.com

Labels:

Ban hits pub operators: half see profits dip 6%

Ban hits pub operators: half see profits dip 6%

Written by: John Harrington
The damaging impact of the smoking ban one year on is laid bare in a survey of Association of Licensed Multiple Retailers (ALMR) members, exclusively for the MA.

The survey of 14 companies — operating more than 1,300 pubs between them — found 36% saw sales fall more than 6% since the ban. Half said profits have fallen more than 6%.

Wet sales and AWP income has been hit the worst as many traditional beer-drinking, machine-playing customers stay away.

A total of 43% of operators said wet sales fell more than 6%, while 36% saw a decline of 1% to 5%.

More than two thirds — 71% — of companies saw machine income fall 6% or more.

“The Government needs to realise that pubs are having a difficult time after the smoking ban,” said ALMR chief executive Nick Bish.

But there is some positive news from the survey, with 29% of firms saying food sales are up more than 6% since the ban.

Bish added: “Food-led pubs are stable or showing marginal improvement as people stay longer, and the family trade has probably gone up.”

In addition, 57% said staff find working in a smoke-free environment “a major benefit”.

The survey shows the level of investment made for the ban.

More than one third (36%) spent £2,001 to £5,000 per site on shelters and other improvements, 29% spent more than £5,000. A smaller proportion, 14%, spent £1,001 to £2,000. The same proportion spent nothing, and 7% spent less than £1,000.
http://www.morningadvertiser.co.uk

Labels:

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Smoking ban 'could kill off Amsterdam cannabis coffee shops'

Smoking ban 'could kill off Amsterdam cannabis coffee shops'
By John Bingham

Amsterdam's controversial cannabis cafes are facing possible extinction when a smoking ban comes into force next month.
Smoking ban 'could kill off Amsterdam cannabis cafes'

New laws similar to those which took effect in England last summer, will ban the smoking of tobacco - but not cannabis - in enclosed public places in the Netherlands from July 1.

Critics say the change will encourage users to turn to much stronger forms of the drug.

Users will still be able to light up joints filled with pure cannabis but technically banned from mixing in tobacco.
The owners of the country's "coffee shops", where cannabis is available over the counter, campaigned for an exception.

But the Dutch prime minister Jan Peter Balkenende was quoted last week as explaining: "Coffee shops will be treated in the same manner as other catering businesses.

"It would have been wrong to move towards a smoke-free catering industry and then make an exception for coffee shops. People would not have understood that."

Some cafes have built separate areas for those who chose not to inhale pure cannabis in the same way as pubs and restaurants in Britain set up outdoor smoking sections in the run-up to the ban in this country.

Many Amsterdam cafe owners fear being driven out of business. But Mark Jacobsen of BCD, a cafe traders' association, told the German newspaper Der Spiegel: "If an official comes into a coffee shop and sees someone smoking a joint, he must confiscate it and send it to a lab to test whether it contains tobacco.

"It is such an arduous procedure that it is going to create numerous problems.

"I don't think they will apply it very strictly during the first year."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk

Labels:

Triple blow sees Gala call time on Birmingham bingo hall

Triple blow sees Gala call time on Birmingham bingo hall
Anna Blackaby
A Birmingham bingo hall is set to close next week, hit by a triple blow from the smoking ban, increased taxation and new gambling laws banning big jackpot machines.

Seventeen jobs will go at the Gala Bingo club in Great Barr, which is set to close its doors to players on June 23.

The club owner, Gala Coral, is currently in consultation with employees to discuss relocating staff to neighbouring clubs in the area.

Gala Coral said external factors were behind the closure, citing the smoking ban, the scrapping of big jackpot gaming machines and the Chancellor’s decision not to relieve the industry of double taxation.

Gala, which is mainly owned by private equity firms Candover, Cinven and Permira, is one of the UK’s biggest operators of licensed betting shops, bingo halls and casinos.

The smoking ban has hit bingo halls harder than other leisure industries as a disproportionately high number of bingo players are smokers.

In September last year, the government closed a loophole in gambling legislation that had allowed £500 jackpots machines – called Section 21 machines – to proliferate in bingo halls.

Gala, like other bingo hall operators, was forced to remove the big jackpot machines under the new Gambling Act.

Bingo Association communications manager Steve Baldwin said: “No other sector in gambling saw its entitlement to machines reduce, some sectors saw their entitlement to machines increase.”

The bingo industry has also suffered from tax laws meaning bingo companies, unlike other gambling sectors, pay Gross Profits Tax as well as VAT.

Calls from the bingo industry for the government to scrap VAT on bingo products went unheeded in the Chancellor’s Spring budget.

Bingo Association chief executive, Paul Talboys called the move “a slap in the face for bingo players across the country.”

SVG Capital, an investor in Gala Coral co-owner Permira, said in March that Gala Coral had almost halved in value in the preceding year.

Mr Baldwin said: “The industry has seen a significant number of clubs close – 37 in 2007 and more have closed this year.
“Jobs are being lost and communities are losing a key social service. “

Bingo is an important social facility, not just a business.”

* Bingo is one of the UK’s most popular leisure activities – more than 8.5 million people played bingo last year and 17,000 people are employed in the sector.
http://www.birminghampost.net

Labels:

Monday, June 16, 2008

People giving up going to the pub but not smoking

People giving up going to the pub but not smoking

By Roger Bleasdale
SIX months on from my original rant about the smoking ban, I am pleased to report that since then many locals have at last managed to kick the habit of lifetime.
For these days, rather than enjoy an hour of an evening introducing the back of their neck to a pint, whilst enjoying a calming cigarette down at the local, today they huddle up at home in front of the goggle box.

On the plus side, this does mean ADVERTISEMENTthat families spend much more time together, albeit in a cloud of fag smoke, whilst assessing the dubious talents on screen in the latest reality show.

And whilst sitting there, why not have a few cans of the Bavarian Beer picked up at the local supermarket for only a fiver for a dozen?

And so the happy bands of smokers that gathered upon the footpaths of the port back in July last year are no more. The problem is that they are no longer inside the pub either.

Economically, the ban has obviously been a great success – that is at least for the smoker. These days he can invest all the money that he would have spent down the pub on cigarettes and tobacco, especially since both became so expensive after the last budget.

But then again he isn't going to pay shop prices is he? For who on earth buys cigarettes and tobacco in England these days?

Today, your smoking sophisticate jets off to the continent and buys stocks to keep him puffing away happily, until the next time he fancies a few more days away in the sunshine.

Thus does the Spanish Chancellor of the Exchequer benefit from our largesse, whilst poor old Mr. Darling thinks that the reduction in revenue has been caused by people stopping smoking!

So after a winter spent dodging around corners in an attempt to dodge the icy blast of a nor' easterly gale, I feel it could be time that I too seriously considered giving up the pub. Maybe I'm missing something and should spend some time watching a disparate group of deluded self promoters all locked together in a single building? But then again I've been watching the Deaduns darts team perform for the better part of two decades, so maybe things will be more normal amongst the denizens of Big Brother 9!

Oh, and I'll be puffing my head off and downing a few Latvian lagers at the same time.

Roger Bleasdale Fleetwood and District Darts League
http://www.fleetwoodtoday.co.uk

Labels:

Friday, June 13, 2008

Clubland turns on Labour

Clubland turns on Labour
by Mark Ritchie

The government has been accused of “crushing the lifeblood” out of clubland through a string of new laws which are closing light entertainment venues across the UK.
In a damning open letter written by Barry Slasberg - a leading club official and a high-profile member of the Club and Institute Union’s ruling National Executive Committee - minister Gerry Sutcliffe is singled out for criticism.

Sutcliffe, who has held the licensing portfolio since June 2007, is accused of publicly lamenting the legislative decisions that have gone against clubland, but doing little to help the struggling industry.

Since the introduction of the smoking ban, falling attendances at clubs have caused many to close, while other legislative changes, for example the introduction of a new club registration system, are also causing venue administration costs to increase.

“Mr Sutcliffe is the latest in a long line of prominent politicians who have given the highest praise to our movement,” Slasberg writes in his letter to the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Non-Profit Making Members’ Clubs.

“He lamented the decisions that have gone against us of late - as indeed all politicians do. They do not seem to understand the devastating cumulative effect of their actions.

“If all individual politicians are telling the truth when they speak to their electorate about the proven facts of the great worth of our clubs, then why is this support not reflected in the decisions they make collectively?”

He warned that clubland - one of the leading employers of light entertainers in the UK - was in “great peril”, before finishing the letter by claiming he had decided to go public “in order to reverse the unendurable and perpetual legislative tirade against us”.

“It is appreciated there are problems outside the domain of the law, but those brought about through legislation are certainly crushing the lifeblood from us,” he added.

Slasberg’s complaints include increasing costs of club registration from £2 annually to “hundreds of pounds a year” and a similar rise in the cost of administration fees. He also accuses the Labour government of going back on a manifesto pledge to exclude private members’ clubs from the smoking ban.

CIU general secretary Kevin Smyth has previously warned that rising beer prices, in part due to government duty increases, are hitting clubland hard. According to Smyth, a combination of this and the smoking ban has made the last year the hardest in his 30-year involvement with the CIU. These problems have had a worrying knock-on effect for performers.

Variety artists speaking at last month’s Equity Annual Representative Conference claimed that work opportunities in pubs and clubs have fallen by as much as 50%.

• Meanwhile, Gorse Hill Working Men’s Club in Swindon has become one of the latest venues offering live entertainment to close. The club, which boasted a fully sprung dance floor, has been forced to shut its doors after going into administration.
http://www.thestage.co.uk

Labels:

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Will Germany's Constitutional Court Overturn Smoking Ban?

Will Germany's Constitutional Court Overturn Smoking Ban?
By Dietmar Hipp

Germany's Constitutional Court is due to consider this week three complaints put forward against the country's smoking ban by bar owners. The court may well rule that smoking should once again be allowed in small bars and discos.

The walls are covered with posters of Janis Joplin, Jim Morrison and Johnny Cash, the ads are for whisky, vodka and tequila, the music coming from the loudspeakers is by Cat Stevens, Jethro Tull and Blue Öyster Cult, and clouds of cigarette smoke float through the room.


Sylvia Thimm, 45, has been the owner of Doors, a bar in Berlin's fashionable Prenzlauer Berg neighborhood, for the past six years. She is proud of her dimly lit haven. "I'm not just selling beer here," she says. "I'm selling an attitude to life."

But Thimm fears that all of that could soon end. Seventy percent of her patrons are smokers, and in Berlin, smoking is banned (more...) in all bars that have no separate room for smokers. Thimm is still allowing smokers to enjoy their habit in her 34-square-meter (366-square-foot) bar, and fines are not yet being handed out to violators in Berlin. But all of that will change on July 1, when the grace period for enforcement of the city's new anti-smoking law comes to an end.

Many of her patrons have indicated that if they aren't even allowed to smoke at Doors, they'll stay at home or go someplace else. Thimm still doesn't know what she'll do when that happens. "Then I'll have to come up with a Plan B," she says. "I'll probably have to look for a different job."

But because she likes her current occupation, Thimm has taken it upon herself to challenge Berlin's smoking ban before Germany's Federal Constitutional Court. The court's decision could prove to be the salvation of Thimm's pub. This Wednesday, the justices in the southwestern city of Karlsruhe will hear three out of roughly 30 pending constitutional complaints regarding smoking bans. Silvia Thimm's is one of them.

Hans-Jürgen Papier, the Constitutional Court's chief justice, recently indicated that the public can expect, by early August at the latest, a substantial ruling that will "fairly comprehensively clarify" the issues that have been raised. The intention is to provide legal certainty throughout Germany.

This is what happens when Germany's 16 federal states impose socially controversial rules on issues ranging from regulations on attack dogs to university tuition and now smoking bans. Almost every state decides on its own individual solution to the issue so that, in the end, it is left up to the Constitutional Court to establish a modicum of legal uniformity and clarity.

There are already strong indications that smoking bans which make no exceptions for single-room bars and clubs will hardly stand up to the Karlsruhe court's scrutiny. The justices certainly must have their reasons for having requested roughly 50 position statements from state governments and state parliaments, and from consumer, industry and health organizations. Moreover, it is surely no coincidence that the court has selected three complaints that are all directed against the absence of exceptions to smoking bans.

In most states except Bavaria, bar and restaurant owners with multiple rooms in their establishments can declare one room a smoking area. In principle, however, bars with only one room must ban smoking completely in their interior.

Forcing her patrons to smoke outside is not a solution for Thimm. Her bar is busy from 8 p.m. until the early morning hours, or until her last guests decide to go home. "If they start smoking outside after 11 p.m., the neighbors will protest."

Berlin's Prenzlauer Berg neighborhood is becoming increasingly gentrified, which is bad news for some long-established nightspots. "Bars that have been around for more than 20 years are now closing their doors," says Thimm, who grew up in the area when it was still part of the capital of East Germany. According to Thimm, the smoking ban is the "nail in the coffin" for the traditional bars that have managed to stay afloat until now.

Cash-Flow Problems

Uli Neu owns Pfauen, a bar in the historic center of Tübingen, a university town near Stuttgart. His complaint is another of the three selected by the Constitutional Court. He has been struggling with the effects of the smoking ban for almost a year now. When the ban was passed in his state, Baden-Württemberg, Neu's turnover dropped by some 30 percent. "It happened abruptly on Aug. 1," he says, adding that he barely manages to survive today. He says that the only reason he is able to keep the bar open is that his landlord "doesn't come knocking on my door the minute I run into cash-flow problems."

According to the results of surveys of their membership conducted by the German Association of Hotels and Restaurants (DEHOGA), Neu's dilemma is not an isolated case. One-fifth of all bar and restaurant owners nationwide complain that their sales have declined by 20 percent or more since smoking bans were introduced.

In the state of Hesse, for example, single-room establishments suffered an average 31-percent decline in sales, while one in five have lost at least 50 percent of their business. In the southwestern state of Baden-Württemberg, more than half of all owners of small bars and restaurants are worried about their ability to stay in business. In response to an inquiry from the Constitutional Court, the Federal Office of Statistics found that although "establishments primarily selling beverages" also saw declines in sales in late 2007 in states that had no smoking bans at the time, they were not as substantial as the drop in sales in states with bans.

Neu has been running his bar, popular with students and Tübingen locals, for the past 23 years. Pfauen is open seven days a week, and Neu spends 60 hours a week working there, either behind the bar or in the kitchen, where he prepares stews and the Alsatian pizza known as Flammkuchen to serve as bar food. In the past, Neu hired students to help out in the bar every day, but he has had to reduce his employees' total weekly hours from 80 to 40. He now runs the bar on his own from Sundays to Wednesdays.

Ironically, Neu had a relatively powerful ventilation system installed in his bar 10 years ago. Nowadays his sales suffer because guests are constantly going outside to smoke. "And if they're standing outside," says Neu, "they're not drinking beer." Unlike some other bar and restaurant owners in Tübingen, Neu doesn't turn a blind eye to regulars breaking the rules. "I may be filing a complaint against the law," he says. "But as long as it's in effect I'm going to abide by it."

The third case coming before the Constitutional Court relates to Musikpark, a discotheque in the city of Heilbronn north of Stuttgart, where the smoking ban seems especially absurd.

In four states -- Baden-Württemberg, Brandenburg, Saxony and Saxony-Anhalt -- patrons of a discotheque wishing to smoke are required to go outside even if the club has several rooms. In those states, bars and restaurants are permitted to have designated smoking areas, but discotheques are not.
Paradoxically, large discos like Musikpark are ideally suited for having separate smoking areas. At Musikpark, a glass-walled lounge above the main dancefloor is already practically hermetically sealed. Nonsmokers would not even have to walk through smoky rooms, and smokers could keep an eye on the nonsmoking section at all times.

Wolfgang Wirsing, Musikpark's manager, has trouble understanding the peculiar exception for discotheques. "They even allow smoking in beer tents, where there are kids and there is absolutely no ventilation."

Musikpark, on the other hand, doesn't allow anyone under 18 to walk in the door, and the club's ventilation system is twice as powerful as required by law for discos. The entire interior air can be replaced about 15 times an hour. "If we turn up the ventilation system all the way," says Wirsing, pointing to the artificial fog in the middle of the dance floor, "that'll be gone in 20 seconds."
oday 04:13 am
By Subverted
Since last fall, the club, which Wirsing describes as a "total nighttime experience," has seen only 1,500 people come through its doors on a typical weekend instead of the usual 2,200. Turnover has dropped by about 30 percent as a result.

The dance club is no longer open on Thursdays, except during holiday periods, and on Fridays and Saturdays two rooms are now closed. Ten full-time employees have been let go. They now work for the club on a part-time basis.

Wirsing and his business partners operate more than 40 discotheques throughout Germany, Austria and Switzerland, which generate total annual sales of about €40 million ($63 million). In those discos with inside smoking sections, says Wirsing, sales have declined by no more than 20 percent.

Oddly enough, Wirsing's smallest establishment, a club in the Bavarian town of Moosburg an der Isar, is now one of his most successful. Thanks to a special provision of Bavaria's anti-smoking law, the disco is now an official smokers' club, with more than 6,000 registered members. The disco in Heilbronn, on the other hand, is already "on shaky ground," says Wirsing.

The justices in Karlsruhe have already shown that they have special reservations about a general smoking ban in discotheques. For example, they want the state of Baden-Württemberg to explain why there is no exception for discos that do not allow patrons under 18 through their doors. They also want to know whether the state can provide them with information on why it ought not to be possible to completely seal off smoking rooms from other rooms in discotheques, especially since this does not appear to present a problem in bars and restaurants. So far the attorneys for the state government have been elusive in responding to the court's requests.

In the end, Baden-Württemberg officials will have trouble coming up with convincing answers to the high court's questions. Club manager Wirsing says that he can demonstrate that dance clubs elsewhere have not had any problems with separate smoking sections. In the disco he runs in the eastern city of Erfurt, for example, he plans to install a comfortable smoking lounge in July, when the state's smoking ban takes effect. The owner of the building, and Wirsing's landlord, is the state of Thuringia.
http://www.spiegel.de

Labels:

Saturday, June 7, 2008

Smokers should ‘wear a jumper’

Smokers should ‘wear a jumper’

OLDHAM’S Environment Minister proved he is always on the look out to save the planet.

Phil Woolas warned the Commons Environment committee that there had been a tenfold increase in patio heaters at licensed premises since the smoking ban came into force.

And the eco-friendly Oldham East and Saddleworth MP suggested smokers could wear a jumper when going outside to light-up.

He told an amused committee: “The official line to take when outside is wear a jumper.”

He made the comments when giving evidence to the committee about Britain’s housing plans.

Housing Minister Caroline Flint told the committee that, despite the current fall in house prices, it would be unwise to revise the targets as the underlying need would not go away.

She said: “In the current climate we expect fewer to be built than last year ....these targets are challenging but long-term need will not change.”
http://www.oldham-chronicle.co.uk

Labels:

NEVER LOST FOR WORDS: Protecting kids is feeble excuse for smoke ban

NEVER LOST FOR WORDS: Protecting kids is feeble excuse for smoke ban

Babies are put at risk by smokers - allegedly
by Sam Clarke

MUMMY wears a pinny with a pretty pair of Marigolds tucked into the waistband. She gets up at 6.30am every day to cook Daddy's breakfast before he goes off to do important work. He wears a nice crisp suit with a shirt washed and ironed freshly by Mummy the night before.

He polishes his own shoes, though.

Mummy kisses him fondly on the cheek at the front door and turns her attention to the children who have wakened and are already preparing themselves for school having brushed their teeth and combed their hair.

Recognise the scene? Thought not.

It only happens in one corner of Scotland: Shangri-Lanarkshire, world-renowned for its marital bliss, perfect parenting and angelic kids.

And to maintain those high standards South Lanarkshire Council is about to deny a group of wannabe parents the chance of adopting children . . . and with good reason.

Potential child abusers? Certainly not, in fact quite the opposite. They adore children but, through a cruel quirk, nature has denied them the chance to conceive.

They might drink alcohol, eat raw cholesterol, wash it down with liquid sugar and just possibly be the most-stupid people on earth, but none of that matters to the local authority's politically-correct-to-the-point-of-fascist social-workers.

They are about to slap a ban - rubber-stamped by woolly-minded councillors taking the easy way out - on children being adopted by smokers.

I had always been under the impression that adoption was about finding good, stable, loving homes where couples would cherish children abandoned by their natural parents.

The kind of place where early mornings are chaos, the closest Mummy comes to a marigold is pushing the lawn mower and Daddy wouldn't know a tin of boot polish from a black pudding.

In short: a normal household with fall-outs and fall-ins, praise and punishment, retribution and reward. A sound, healthy and occasionally anarchic environment.

Shangri-Lanarkshire's bleeding hearts argue they are out to protect children from the terrible effects of passive smoking but that is a feeble excuse for rejection.

One adoption charity claims 17,000 under-fives are admitted to hospital each year with passive smoking-related illnesses, though fail to back it up with sound science - rather like me claiming that staying smoke-free guarantees a cancer-free life.

Sounds good . . . but doesn't make it true.

Were officials really so concerned about health, no child would ever be pushed in a buggy at car exhaust height, let alone be allowed to travel in one.

Diet would form part of the adoption contract: no naughty E' numbers or health destroying junk foods.

Schools would be a no-no lest the child be stabbed, become a ned or run the gauntlet of perverts lurking in every hedge.

Social workers have deliberately fudged the difference between minimising risk and eliminating it altogether while branding smokers bad parents.

Now pass the heroin and hand me a pen, there's a form to fill in.
http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk

Labels:

Friday, June 6, 2008

Community clubs need help after smoking ban

Community clubs need help after smoking ban
I would like to reply to the article "Labour Club receives council cash" (WEP, May 22).
As a local election candidate for Standish ward in the recent local elections, I campaigned for help for the community clubs and pubs in the area.
I did not have taxpayers' money in mind, but intended to put a robust opposition forward opposing the ludicrous blanket smoking ban which is crippling our leisure industry nationwide.
The EU-wide ban is gold plated by UK civil servants but continental countries have acquired opt-outs which allows smokers to smoke in pubs allocated with ceiling ventilation.
Also pubs and clubs have to pay much higher utility bills and beer prices than their continental counterparts and with supermarkets heavily discounting drinks.
All this means of course is that these outlets will not have much cash for repairs and maintenance.
As for ex councillor George Davies allocating taxpayers' cash to help vandalised Standish Labour Club, well I would agree with this if it was not used for political purposes, because I do believe Standish Labour Club is a genuine community asset.
These clubs organise Christmas parties for pensioners and days out at the seaside for the kids.
Whether they are Tory or Labour clubs, politicians should make more noise concerning excessive charging for energy, uneven playing fields in the sale of alcohol and a campaign for proper smoking areas indoors with ventilation.
Alan Freeman, UKIP, Wigan
http://www.wigantoday.net

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

Venue closes because of smoking ban

Venue closes because of smoking ban
By Emily-Ann Elliott

A venue has been forced to close its doors after business slumped following the introduction of the smoking ban.

Pressure Point, in Richmond Place, Brighton, is now in the process of being sold and it is unclear whether its new owner plans to reopen it as a bar or club.

Gareth Gwynne-Smith, the venue's current owner, said: "When the smoking ban was first introduced in July it was fine, but once the weather got bad we took a significant drop in trade of about 60 per cent.
advertisement

"In February trade picked back up once people got used to it but we had lost about £60,000 between November and January and just couldn't continue."

Mr Gwynne-Smith will now focus on running his events production company NGP Events Ltd, which is based in Brighton.

He said other factors which contributed to the venue's closure is the price of beer and the amount of other venues in Brighton.

He said: "I put six years hard work in here and I am not going to recoup what I spent on it.

"But there are new pubs and bars opening in Brighton all the time and when that is coupled with the fact that nobody has any money at the moment, it is not good."

The venue's 30 staff are also having to look for new employment.

Pressure Point is not the only venue in the area to close this week.

Barfly, in Gloucester Place, has also shut its doors, although Mama Group Plc, which owns the venue, said the closure is temporary.

Clair Chamberlain, marketing and PR manager for the Mama Group Live Music division, said: "The venue is closing for a refit.

"There are a number of things which need to be dealt with including noise transference.

"As far as I am aware it is going to re-open, although I don't know the timings for that.

"People are working hard to transfer its shows to other venues as I speak."

Danny Horwood, co-director of Harmony in the Community, which puts on a night called Carnivalesque at Barfly on the first Friday of every month, was told on Monday evening about the closure.

He said: "They have tried to help us reprogramme our gig but have said absolutely no to any compensation.

"They have cost us more than £1,000 if not more. All of our banners, flyers and posters now have to be redone.

"The annoying thing is they came in and have taken all the gigs away from Pressure Point, which was a local independent venue which has now ended up shutting down and now they have closed."

Carnivalesque has been running for four months and between 300 and 400 people attended.

This Friday it will be at the former Pressure Point venue from 10pm until it finds a new permanent home.
http://www.theargus.co.uk

Labels:

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

Real estate companies making it tougher for smokers in their homes

Real estate companies making it tougher for smokers in their homes
BY XANA O'NEILL AND JORDAN LITE
DAILY NEWS WRITERS
They banned smoking in the bars and restaurants - and now they're coming into New Yorkers' homes.

City real estate companies are jumping on the anti-tobacco bandwagon with new policies that prohibit tenants from lighting up behind their own doors.

It's the latest anti-smoking trend to hit the city since Mayor Bloomberg banned lighting up in bars and restaurants five years ago Sunday.

Clare Walsh just moved into a loft rental at 270 Park Ave. South. Its owner, Pan Am Equities, doesn't allow smoking anywhere in its buildings - including inside the apartments of tenants with new leases.

"It has my full support," said Walsh, 52. "Smoking is a particularly unhealthy, unattractive activity."

City health officials do not have specific data on how many residential buildings have official smoking bans, but real estate experts say a national movement has sprung up around creating smoke-free homes.

"We're going with the times, with the city doing the bans with bars," said David Iwanier, Pan Am Equities' vice president. "We are considerate of everybody's needs, as well as [the need to] to compete with the marketplace."

Manhattan real estate manager Jeff Lamb said most of the roughly 30 co-ops and condos he handles have banned smoking or are in the process of adopting no-smoking house rules.

That means the co-op boards can deny new applicants if they're smokers, or require existing owners who smoke to ventilate their apartments or plug holes to protect their neighbors.

The trend began shortly after a Manhattan Civil Court judge ruled in 2006 that secondhand smoke exposure violates residents' warrant of habitability, Lamb said.

The same year, the U.S. surgeon general reported on health effects from secondhand smoke.

"I would think it's going to become more commonplace," said Lamb, president of J&C Lamb Management.

Still, he said, "In one case, the smoking person, being sensitive to these new guidelines, decided to sell her apartment."

Neither federal nor state laws prevent residential buildings from adopting smoke-free policies, said Jim Bergman of the Smoke-Free Environments Law Project.

Audrey Silk, founder of the smokers' rights group NYC Clash, calls the emerging residential policies just the latest in an "incremental attack."

"First, it was planes for two hours, then six hours, then all planes; then half of restaurants, then all restaurants," Silk said. "Now, the home."

On a smaller scale, individual New Yorkers are making their homes smoke-free. Some 75% of New Yorkers say they have no-smoking rules in their homes, up from 65% in 2006, according to a poll conducted by Zogby International for the NYC Coalition for a Smoke-Free City.
http://www.nydailynews.com

Labels: